AAPS member Menas C. Kafatos. With Bernardo Kastrup, and Henry P. Stapp on the Scientific American Magazine

//AAPS member Menas C. Kafatos. With Bernardo Kastrup, and Henry P. Stapp on the Scientific American Magazine

AAPS member Menas C. Kafatos. With Bernardo Kastrup, and Henry P. Stapp on the Scientific American Magazine

2018-06-02T19:40:39+00:00

Coming to Grips with the Implications of Quantum Mechanics.

The question is no longer whether quantum theory is correct, but what it means

By Bernardo KastrupHenry P. StappMenas C. Kafatos on May 29, 2018

For almost a century, physicists have wondered whether the most counterintuitive predictions of quantum mechanics (QM) could actually be true. Only in recent years has the technology necessary for answering this question become accessible, enabling a string of experimental results—including startling ones reported in 2007 and 2010, and culminating now with a remarkable test reported in May—that show that key predictions of QM are indeed correct. Taken together, these experiments indicate that the everyday world we perceive does not exist until observed, which in turn suggests—as we shall argue in this essay—a primary role for mind in nature. It is thus high time the scientific community at large—not only those involved in foundations of QM—faced up to the counterintuitive implications of QM’s most controversial predictions.

Click here to Continue Reading